| Hundreds of scientists from around the world met for
at a recent scientific conference in southern Taiwan –
the first meeting of its kind in Asia – in order
to discuss the imminent threat posed by bird diseases.
It is clear, however, that the link between avian influenza
and migratory wild birds remains anything but clear.
Taiwan's water birds are one of the country's natural
treasures. The West Coast's tidal mudflats, salt marshes
and mangrove swamps attract both resident and migratory
birds, with some locations boasting over 160 different
species. Moreover, about half of the world's population
of the internationally famous but endangered black-faced
spoonbill spend their winters just north of Tainan in
south Taiwan, making that city an ideal host for the
Waterbirds 2005 Conference, held from November 25-27,
2005.
With recorded sightings of around 500 species –
150 or more species that live on the island year-round,
and 15 endemic species not found in other countries
– Taiwan's birds are so diverse that the field
can be subdivided according to habitat.
Inhabitants of the high mountains such as the Mikado
Pheasant, an species featured on the NT$1,000 bill,
have received a lot of attention from academics and
birdwatchers. Water birds – species found along
rivers and in wetlands – are more numerous and
visible, however, and due to recent fears that migrating
birds could trigger an avian influenza pandemic, waterfowl
are now being talked about more than ever before.
The Waterbirds 2005 Conference attracted a great deal
of media attention, not only due to its focus on the
migration of wild birds and avian diseases, but also
because it was the first international meeting of its
kind ever held in Asia.
Attended by around 400 scholars and wildlife enthusiasts,
the conference was sponsored by the International Waterbird
Society, BirdLife International, the U.S. Geological
Survey, Environment Canada, the International Crane
Foundation, the Wild Bird Federation of Taiwan and the
Taiwan International Birding Society; with backing in
Taiwan from Tainan City Hall, the Council of Agriculture,
and the Government Information Office, which publishes
this newspaper.
The first of the invited plenary speakers, Ron Ydenberg,
began his address by pointing out that, when the organisers
began setting up the event 18 months earlier, they had
no idea how timely the theme of bird diseases would
turn out to be.
Mr Ydenberg, director of the Centre for Wildlife Ecology
at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada,
provided an overview of the migration process. He said
that birds migrate because the journey enhances their
chances of survival: the attractions of better weather
and a better supply of food outweigh the dangers likely
to be encountered en route, such as predators and pathogens,
and the energy needed to complete the migration.
However, around half of the world's shorebird species
appear to be declining, said Mr Ydenberg. In North America,
up to 80 percent of species are in decline. Even if
extinction is not an immediate threat, falling numbers
are significant in that a smaller population has less
genetic variation, and is therefore more susceptible
to disease outbreaks.
According to Mr Ydenberg, mudflats are especially
attractive to birds, not only because such places usually
have an abundance of food, but also because the lack
of cover can make it more difficult for predators, such
as birds of prey or feral cats, to approach without
being noticed.
Shorebirds, he explained, suffer higher death rates
due to predators at high tide than at low tide, simply
because the rising waters force the birds to move closer
to coastal cover, where the predators may be lurking.
He did not say if this finding could impact conservation
efforts on Taiwan's West Coast, where there is a longstanding
policy of planting windbreak forests very close to the
high-tide line.
Noting that a great deal has been learned in recent
years about bird migrations in North America, Mr Ydenberg
said, “Much less is known about East Asian flyways,
and more needs to be learned”. He mentioned various
hypotheses – including the suggestion that the
stress and exhaustion of the migratory process makes
birds more vulnerable to pathogens like H5N1 –
that cannot be proved or disproved because of a lack
of data. “There's a lot of work we have to do”,
said Mr Ydenberg.
Moving on to the possibility that wild birds could
transmit diseases to domesticated flocks, Ydenberg said
that, to date, there has been no study of this scenario.
But, he suggested, research in British Columbia that
looked at both wild runs of salmon and their farmed
counterparts might provide some idea of what is happening
or what could happen. In Canada, Norway and Scotland,
several wild runs of salmon have become extinct because
of continuous cross-infection between commercial salmon
and wild salmon. This implies that wild birds are more
likely to be victims than vectors of disease –
a point that was also made by other speakers during
the conference.
Cases involving the transmission of Avian Influenza
from birds to humans in Asia have been widely document.
Leslie Dierauf, the second invited plenary speaker,
explored the topic of the transmission of disease across
different species in some detail.
Diseases “can flow across the landscape, and
jump species”, said Ms Dierauf, a wildlife veterinarian
and conservation biologist who is director of the U.S.
Geological Service's National Wildlife Health Center
in Madison, Wisconsin.
Ms Dierauf outlined the phenomenon of zoonosis –
when a disease such as rabies crosses from the animal
kingdom to infect humans – and noted that around
75 percent of new diseases appearing in humans are zoonotic.
According to Dierauf, there is no doubt that migrating
birds can spread viruses: snow geese are carriers of
avian cholera, a disease that is becoming more common
in wild birds. One recent outbreak was in 2000 in South
Korea, where more than 12,000 birds, 90 percent of them
Baikal teals, died.
“Traditional practices in Asia put wild birds
closer to domesticated flocks and pet birds”,
said Dierauf. She cited the example of duck plague,
which traveled from the Netherlands to poultry in the
United States, and then into North America's wild bird
population. She pointed out, however, that wild birds
are more often victims than culprits.
Variables including climate change, industrialization,
agriculture practices and antibiotic resistance mean
the situation is constantly evolving, Dierauf explained.
“Don't forget wildlife in the health equation.
Be vigilant. Use wild birds as sentinels of environmental
health”.
At the press conference that followed the delivery
of these two speeches, Marco Lambertini of BirdLife
International expressed concern that wild birds are
being mistakenly portrayed as the main vehicle of disease
transmission. Claiming that evidence of this was “extremely
weak” or absent, he urged the media not to overstate
the possibility of any link. “All evidence points
to the root causes being in the poultry industry, the
raising of chickens, geese and ducks”. In supporting
his argument, Lambertini listed three facts: that no
healthy migratory bird has checked positive for avian
flu (although some dead birds have, suggesting migratory
birds are not the disease vectors); that H5N1 is especially
virulent, and usually leaves its victims unable to fly;
and that previous outbreaks have all been traced to
poultry farms or food products.
Moreover, he said, viewing wild birds as “prime
suspects” is dangerous because it deflects attention
from more probable causes, such as the movement of poultry
and the pet-bird trade.
“The trade of wild birds and pet birds is a
major concern”, he said, noting that such birds
are often mixed with other birds, including poultry,
in conditions that make transmission easier.
However, because viruses sometimes mutate, it is not
impossible that wild birds will play a role in bird-flu
transmission in the future, Lambertini said.
He called for an effective monitoring system that
could investigate suspicious deaths of wild birds, because
“wild birds are a good early warning system for
problems in the environment”. Responding to those
in Taiwan and elsewhere who have been urging people
to avoid birds, Lambertini said that birdwatching is
now more important than ever, because bird enthusiasts
can help monitor avian health.
During the press conference, Robert Butler, a senior
research scientist with Environment Canada's Canadian
Wildlife Service, expressed optimism about the future
for Taiwan's water birds. “The progressive attitude
Taiwan has taken to conservation is a real model for
the rest of Asia”, he said. Noting that Taiwan's
government has moved to protect the uplands, and that
several major rivers have been cleaned up, he stressed
that conservation work in the country's densely populated
and highly industrialized lowlands is now the biggest
challenge.
Research papers presented on the second and third
days of the conference underlined the black-faced spoonbill's
role as a “flagship species” for conservationists.
Eleven of the papers concerned studies of the black-faced
spoonbill; no other species in Taiwan was the subject
of more than a single study.
Among the findings presented were those by one Taiwanese
team who analyzed mitochondrial DNA diversity to estimate
the decline of the species, concluding that the current
population is no more than one-ninth of what it once
was. Another study by local researchers predicted that
the global black-faced spoonbill population will rebound
to 4,000 or more by 2014.
One paper implied that Taiwan's plan to massively
expand wind power, which is billed as a “green
technology”, may not bode well for the country's
birds.
The coastline of Changhua County in Central Taiwan
is an important habitat for wintering and breeding shorebirds,
but it is also ideal for electricity-generating wind
turbines. The paper noted that large numbers of birds
pass through the area's existing wind farms, and evidence
from Japan and elsewhere confirms that poorly sited
turbines can jeopardize wild bird populations through
habitat damage or collision with the blades. Adding
hundreds of new turbines may create a new set of problems.
In early December, BirdLife International issued a
press release asserting that, because avian migrations
in the Northern Hemisphere have not been followed by
any significant outbreaks of bird flu, “the most
obvious explanation is that migrating wild birds are
not spreading the disease”. Three weeks later,
the same organization's suggestion that bird flu may
be spread by the practice (in several countries, including
Taiwan) of using chicken dung in fish farms was reported
throughout the world.
The survival of the Mikado Pheasant and Taiwan's other
endemic birds is in the hands of the island's people.
However, many species of water bird have homes in different
countries, and protecting only their habitats here will
not help them survive in the long run. Cross-border
protection efforts are required if these species are
to be saved from extinction.
Taiwan is home to many different bird species, and
its people are becoming more environmentally aware and
internationally active. The country's bird experts and
enthusiasts can expect to see a lot more of their overseas
counterparts, during future conferences and dedicated
birding trips.
|